As you probably all know by now, the Fundação Dom Cabral is one of the world’s leading centre for executive and organizations development. In 2010, it was ranked 6th by the Financial Times (I am no great fan of such rankings; it is there for the record and those who need it;)

Since July 2009, I regularly join the Foundation for work in common. During my yearly appraisal with three members of the Board (a rather frank and direct two way feedback discussion as I like them;), I was seeking to understand the reasons for the Institute’s success. The determination and humility of its leaders (reminding of the “Good to Great” attributes) linked to its values and the quality of its clients and people were mentioned.

But Wagner Veloso, one of the three directors present, drew my attention on the very unusual way in which the Foundation combines elements of traditional organizations with free wheeling ones of organic communities[1].

At the top, sit three Presidents. They are the visible part of the iceberg to the outside world as well as the institutional link towards authorities, regulators, press, clients etc… The outside world needs stable reference points and contacts, so the Presidents tenure has been stable over the years. Interestingly, the Presidents embody, through their styles and characters, the unspoken values and culture of the Foundation: stability and respectability for one, the humanistic and people side for another and the creativity and charisma for the third. The stability around them has also kept potential politics to the minimum as they were clearly there to last.

Below them is a team of Directors: from a number of five a few years ago, they decided amongst themselves to reduce their group to three, meaning that two of them chose to go back to “the ranks”. Their tenure usually has a 3-5 year horizon in order to enable them to run mid-long term projects with enough serenity. However, it is made clear that they act as “primus inter pares” and that, once their mission is over they should normally rejoin their colleagues and let someone else be “invited” (the word “promoted” is banned) to take over their heavy responsibilities. The person invited is therefore given a chance to prove her leadership, organizational and managerial skills as well as influence the culture and strategy of the firm.

The support functions, due to the sharp level of specialization are also relatively stable although, it is my understanding that, should someone wish to grow and develop by changing department, their request is always taken serious and explored with an open mind.

The organic part comes from the way professors (delivering the courses) and project leaders (relationship managers) are organized… Contrary to most of the business schools I know (and despite their vehement protests and claims of the contrary), a project leader at Foundation Cabral has the total freedom to choose who they feel is the best fit for a given project. She has no pressure for hiring a full time faculty (whose salary is paid by the school) and may choose anyone from the outside… This is giving place to a healthy “Mercato” as in football, where visiting (self employed, who account for more than 80% of faculty in FDC) and full time faculty are encouraged to continuously develop their skills, edge and style, if they wish to be invited to teach on programs. It also ensures that the client gets the best team and not the one that will help the institution’s financial bottom line at best. The same goes for using or not the school’s dream campus: Project leaders are free to choose the right environment for their course and not kindly asked to support the heavy infrastructure created around the school (which I admit I am still struggling with: where is an executive education’s main value? Its fixed assets and infrastructure or its “daily moving assets” teaching and supporting every day?).

I do not know how much of this is relevant to your own organizations but I thought it might be thought provoking (and reassuring to see for once an academic organization ahead of the pack in terms of organization and leadership;)

On my way to a long non-stop series of workshops and engagement processes in Brazil, as well as a short and welcome ten days of break with my family. I will therefore let you all “off the hook” for this month of August and start again around mid-September (we are moving house upon our return…). Have a great week all!

Didier


[1] see posts of February 6th, 14th and 22nd

{ 3 comments }

The Fair Process of Engagement

July 18, 2010

Who said that Business Schools are way too expensive for what they truly bring? I did… and need to change this slightly: Business Schools may be a good deal when somebody else pays to go at your place and brings you one or two interesting models from an “edutainment” program…
This week, I was shown by [...]

2 comments Read the full article →

“From passive consumption to active co-creation”

July 11, 2010

“This was the best experience of my professional career: the program you designed kept external interventions to the minimum and allowed us to share our own experiences, learn together and from each other. We now feel that our future does not depend from consultants but is entirely in our hands!” This was one of the [...]

4 comments Read the full article →

“Love it, Change it or Leave it!”

July 4, 2010

So, Dunga’s Brazil is finally heading home after betraying of all its “footballistic values”, having blindly followed leadership and organizational styles which were so obviously “un-Brazilian”. Far worse, Brazil lost its unofficial ranking of No1 favorite nation in the hearts of all true “futebol” lovers for the first time since 1958… But what annoyed me [...]

3 comments Read the full article →

“The eight misconceptions about engagement”

June 27, 2010

What pushed Steve Balmer, Microsoft’s C.E.O. to seek to motivate his people in such a way that gained him instantaneous reputation on the web… Today, type “Dance monkey boy” on Google and the following clip appears:

The intention probably was to galvanize the troops, show a new leadership style was emerging (Balmer had just been elected [...]

3 comments Read the full article →

“Insights, one week into South Africa’s World Cup”

June 20, 2010

M.K. Gandhi used to say that “The only authentic religion is the universal fraternity amongst people”. I guess, if he were reincarnated today in South Africa, he may have added: “And these days football is the only thing which seems to connect people from the five continents, from all religions and beliefs for a too [...]

7 comments Read the full article →

“Going down, all the Saints are helpful”

June 13, 2010

“Para descer, todo Santo ajuda” (to go down all the Saints are helpful) say the pragmatic people of the Brazilian state of Bahia (where my wonderful wife comes from).
A recent event brought this old saying back to the surface: the Fundação Dom Cabral (www.fdc.org.br) for whom I design and deliver tailored programs a week/month in [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

“Man is limited not so much by his tools but by his vision”

June 6, 2010

I love this quote from Richard Pascale and am sometimes sadly reminded of it when my partners and I or even a respected client are unable to  break the boundaries from our self-created, self-limiting “mental prisons”.
It is so exasperating when we find ourselves turning in circles (Marcial Losada’s fixed attractor?), drifting into projecting more of [...]

2 comments Read the full article →

When Followers Give Legitimacy To Their Leader

May 30, 2010

Duncan Sterling was the kind of student any Dean would dream of having on their M.B.A. as his sharp mind and remarks were keeping faculty on the edge and he would “take no bullshit”… I guess he hasn’t changed much! He commented on a recent post of this blog and added a clip which I [...]

9 comments Read the full article →

“Maybe it is my fault…”

May 23, 2010

Here is to the wonderfully courageous, highly human and therefore imperfect leaders who courageously take the risk of exposing themselves, by getting closer to their people, aiming at co-creating clarity, purpose and wide ownership around their company’s Strategic Intent. Most of the times, their people respond in a truly mature way (“adult-adult” as the Transactional [...]

3 comments Read the full article →